What is CitePatch, and how does it compare with other GEO tools?

CitePatch is a GEO agent for marketing teams: it measures how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Microsoft Copilot and Google's AI Overviews and AI Mode mention a brand, finds the pages behind each gap, drafts the fix as a reviewable change — a GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket pull request or a CMS draft — and checks afterwards whether it moved the answers. Most GEO tools stop at the dashboard; CitePatch carries each gap through to a change on your site and its verification.

What is the Free Audit?

A preliminary signal on your public domain: we observe how AI answers a handful of buying questions and show where you appear, where you don't, and the evidence behind it. No credit card, no call — and we're upfront about what a preliminary pass can and can't tell you.

Is this just another AI visibility tracker?

No. Trackers stop at a dashboard. CitePatch traces each gap to inspectable evidence, prepares a small reviewable change to a page you own, and measures the result against the original prompts after you deploy.

Which AI surfaces do you measure?

Seven, each measured separately: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode.

How long does a full patch loop take?

Days, not seconds — and that's deliberate. Observing real answers, diagnosing with evidence, approving a change, deploying and verifying against the original prompts each take time we don't fake away.

What do I need to get started?

Just your public domain. The Free Audit runs on publicly available signals — no integration, no tracking script, no credit card. When you're ready to ship fixes, you connect only the systems that own the pages you want to change.

Be the brand AI recommendsYour GEO agent for marketing

Works on your AI visibility while your team focuses on what matters.

Try 7 days free

7-day free trial on your own domain. No credit card, no call.

Vera

Claude Sonnet 5 · Medium

CitePatch works better with your integrationsConnect integrations →×

CitePatch does the GEO work.You call the shots.

Meet Vera, CitePatch's agent. She researches, writes, measures and reports with your brand's data; you approve what goes out and set the direction.

Works on her own

Ask for a report, an article or a task for your team and she prepares it from your data. Weekly routines are coming soon.

Beyond your site

Every run surfaces new citations, and she suggests threads to reply to and blogs to reach out to, with the reply already drafted. You decide whether it's sent.

With your content

She writes new pages and fixes the ones losing citations, using your catalog data and your tone. Everything arrives as a draft for you to review.

And reports back

Connected to your catalog, your CMS, Search Console and GA4, she measures how your visibility shifts on every AI engine and reports it to you.

Inside CitePatch

Everything you need to be the answer.

Add Brands

Track your brand against the competitors that actually matter to your buyers.

Brands

YouNortiumnortium.com · tracking
Vektor Suitevektorsuite.com · tracking
Dataluxdatalux.io · tracking
Metrivametriva.com · tracking
Lumina Analyticsluminaanalytics.com · tracking
+ Add brand

Prompt Suggester

CitePatch proposes the questions buyers ask, grouped by intent. Approve, edit or reject.

Prompt queue

comparisonHow does Nortium compare to Vektor Suite?
pricingHow much does Nortium cost a month?
complianceDoes Nortium have a SOC 2 statement?

Which Nortium alternative fits a mid-market team?

AddEditReject

Shopping

See which products and merchants ChatGPT and Google AI Mode show for shopping queries.

Reports

A weekly summary in your inbox, plus exportable reports for the team.

Weekly summaryExport

Nortium · week of Jul 14

Brand mentions44%▲ 7 pts
Questions covered9▲ 2
Competitor mentions21%▼ 3 pts
Open findings3▼ 1

What changed

Added a SOC 2 line to the pricing page
Nortium re-entered the “alternatives” shortlist

The questions you already have

Buyers now ask AI. Three questions follow.

Do we even show up?

When a buyer asks for a recommendation, your brand is in the answer or it isn’t.

AI answer · Perplexity

“…for mid-market teams we recommend Vektor Suite and a few others.”

mentionedVektor Suite
mentionedDatalux
mentionedMetriva
not mentionedYouNortium

Why does a competitor appear instead?

AI answers cite sources. There’s a reason behind every mention, and every omission.

Citation trace

Which Nortium alternative fits mid-market teams?

Answer citesvektorsuite.com/compareVektor Suite vs alternatives

Also citeddatalux.io/compare · Datalux pricing and plans
not citedYour page

What should we actually change?

You need one defensible change to one page, not a score, and proof it worked.

Awaiting your approvalProposed change · pricing page

BeforeTrusted by leading enterprises
AfterSOC 2-compliant analytics for mid-market

Evidence: Does Nortium have a SOC 2 statement?

ApproveEdit

Report vs. fix

Trackers report. CitePatch fixes.

Every finding becomes a change to a page you own, then gets re-observed against the same prompts.

The loop is the difference — not a superiority claim.

The system

Four jobs. One connected system.

AI Monitor

Coverage of your approved buying questions, down to each original AI answer.

Also: Prompt Explorer

Tracked prompts

Best analytics for mid-market teams44%
Vektor Suite alternatives31%
GapDoes Nortium have a SOC 2 statement?0%
Self-serve analytics pricing18%
Compliance-ready analytics platforms9%

Evidence Graph

Every gap traced from prompt to answer, claim, citation and page.

Also: Sentiment Analysis

Evidence trail

Prompt: “Which Nortium alternative fits a mid-market team?”

Answer · Perplexity“Vektor Suite is the most complete option”

Citesvektorsuite.com/compare
not citedYour page

Playbooks & Patch Generation

Owned gaps become small, factual, human-approved changes.

Awaiting your approvalPlaybook · SOC 2 line for pricing

Observed3 answers credit Vektor Suite on compliance
ProposedAdd a SOC 2 line to the pricing page
Wherepricing page

ApproveEdit

Playbook Status

Drafted, opened, applied — every change stays linked to the Monitor, which keeps re-observing the same questions.

Playbook · pricing page

Does Nortium have a SOC 2 statement?

Before · Jul 1421%
Change shipped · Jul 1821%
Verified28% ▲7pts

Coverage

Surfaces measured separately. Methods kept visible.

CitePatch keeps every surface separate and records how each answer was captured. An API answer is not treated as identical to a consumer interface, and one query is never treated as a benchmark.

Observation methods and limitations are documented in every report.

ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
Copilot
Google AI Overviews
Google AI Mode

How we prove it

We hold our own claims to the same standard.

CitePatch runs on evidence discipline: repeated observations, separated surfaces, dated measurements, and honest conclusions — including inconclusive ones.

Repeated observations
Separated surfaces
Dated measurements

Read the methodology

Where fixes land

Patches land where your content lives.

A patch isn't a suggestion to copy-paste. CitePatch prepares it as a reviewable change in the system that owns the page — a pull request, a CMS draft, a document — and never publishes it for you.

Code

Opens a reviewable pull request.

CMS & commerce

Drafts and staged changes — never auto-published.

Docs & storage

A document uploaded for handoff.

Export

A standalone patch report that works anywhere.

Playbook — SOC 2 compliance line for pricing

GitHubpull request opened
WordPressdraft created
Google Drivedoc uploaded

Questions, answered honestly

Frequently asked questions

What is CitePatch, and how does it compare with other GEO tools?
CitePatch is a GEO agent for marketing teams: it measures how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Microsoft Copilot and Google's AI Overviews and AI Mode mention a brand, finds the pages behind each gap, drafts the fix as a reviewable change — a GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket pull request or a CMS draft — and checks afterwards whether it moved the answers. Most GEO tools stop at the dashboard; CitePatch carries each gap through to a change on your site and its verification.
Compare the 12 best GEO tools and agents →
What is the Free Audit?
A preliminary signal on your public domain: we observe how AI answers a handful of buying questions and show where you appear, where you don't, and the evidence behind it. No credit card, no call — and we're upfront about what a preliminary pass can and can't tell you.
Is this just another AI visibility tracker?
No. Trackers stop at a dashboard. CitePatch traces each gap to inspectable evidence, prepares a small reviewable change to a page you own, and measures the result against the original prompts after you deploy.
Does CitePatch publish changes to my site automatically?
Never. Every patch lands as a reviewable change in the system that owns the page — a pull request, a CMS draft, a document. You approve and publish it yourself.
Which AI surfaces do you measure?
Seven, each measured separately: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode.
How long does a full patch loop take?
Days, not seconds — and that's deliberate. Observing real answers, diagnosing with evidence, approving a change, deploying and verifying against the original prompts each take time we don't fake away.
What do I need to get started?
Just your public domain. The Free Audit runs on publicly available signals — no integration, no tracking script, no credit card. When you're ready to ship fixes, you connect only the systems that own the pages you want to change.